Michael Amori is CEO and cofounder of Virtualitics. A data scientist and entrepreneur with a background in finance and physics.
getty
Much of the early hype about AI has focused on large language models (LLMs)—the companies behind them, how powerful they are, how quickly they’re improving and how broadly they can be applied. LLMs are undeniably powerful, but their value often depends on how they're integrated into enterprise systems. By combining domain expertise, enterprise data and agentic frameworks, modern software-as-a-service (SaaS) platforms can help bridge the gap between LLM outputs and real-world decisions.
For many enterprise organizations, access to powerful models is only one component of successful AI adoption. Equally important is turning that capability into something that works reliably within specific industry and company workflows. In many enterprise deployments, software platforms connect models to enterprise data, workflows, governance policies and operational constraints.
For example, an analyst asking an LLM to summarize a logistics disruption may not get an answer that fully weighs project priorities, supply constraints and compliance rules. The value of the LLM depends on combining its outputs with enterprise data, human judgment and the operational context in which decisions are made.
LLMs generate answers, yet they may not propose trusted recommendations grounded in nuance, industry knowledge and operational constraints.
Closing that gap often involves combining model capabilities with structured data, domain expertise, business rules and human judgment.
The Illusion Of 'Plug-And-Play' Intelligence
There’s a concerning assumption that LLMs can be dropped directly into enterprise workflows. On the surface, that makes sense. If a model can reason through complex inputs, why not let it guide decisions?
In practice, however, it doesn’t hold up. Enterprise decisions don’t happen in a vacuum; they operate within constraints—fragmented data environments, regulatory requirements, operational thresholds and historical patterns.
Take supply chain leaders. It’s not enough to know there’s a delay. Leaders need to understand which disruption affects the highest-priority program, what alternatives are feasible within cost and timing constraints and how to stay within procurement guardrails. That last-mile insight that leads to action is critical.
The Missing Layer: Decision Infrastructure
What separates successful enterprise AI isn’t the model alone but also the system around it. In many enterprise environments, a decision layer integrates structured and unstructured data, applies business rules and domain logic, and produces recommendations that are explainable, auditable and tied to outcomes.
Without these capabilities, LLMs may produce interesting outputs without consistently delivering reliable, defensible or scalable outcomes.
Putting Enterprise AI Into Practice
Many organizations are moving beyond treating AI as a standalone feature and are investing in software platforms that combine AI capabilities with domain-specific data and governance.
In these environments, the challenge isn’t getting an answer; it’s ensuring that the answer reflects mission priorities, trusted data and organizational priorities before it drives action.
An important advantage comes from pairing LLM flexibility with platforms that translate output into trusted, actionable decisions.
The Partnership Model In Practice
The most effective enterprise AI strategies combine models with software that applies context, rules and workflow discipline. In these environments, the decision layer can define the operating environment, including thresholds and decision criteria, while the LLM handles variability by interpreting unstructured data, navigating edge cases and accelerating analysis. The system itself enforces consistency, helping align outputs with business rules and objectives.
For example, the LLM can interpret maintenance logs, analyst notes and incident reports. The decision layer applies mission priorities, readiness thresholds and policy rules. The result is a ranked, explainable recommendation that can be acted on by the operations team.
In another scenario, the LLM surfaces risk signals across supply chain data. The decision layer evaluates tradeoffs across cost, delay, supplier reliability and program criticality. The result is a recommendation aligned with business objectives.
This mirrors how organizations already work. You don’t rely on a single individual to interpret data, enforce rules and ensure compliance at scale. You build systems and empower people within them. AI should be no different.
When these components work together, AI shifts from experimentation to infrastructure. Organizations may see faster, more consistent decision-making, which can contribute to improvements in cycle time, manual effort and operational risk.
Rethinking How We Evaluate AI
Adopting this model requires a shift in how leaders evaluate AI investments. Organizations evaluating enterprise AI may want to ask:
• Does this system integrate with the workflow where decisions are made?
• Are recommendations traceable to approved data and rules?
• Can operators understand why the system made a recommendation?
• Does it improve cycle time, consistency or resource allocation?
• Can it scale under enterprise governance requirements?
These questions emphasize integration, explainability and governance alongside model capability.
From Experimentation To Execution
Today’s market still overemphasizes what LLMs can do alone, while enterprise value is increasingly being created in the systems that operationalize them.
In many enterprise settings, LLMs deliver the most value when combined with systems that provide organizational context, governance and decision support. That’s why partnerships with enterprise software platforms aren’t just useful but also foundational.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
>> Home